meteohub.de

OK, that is good news.
I have a big spike in this month, but now I know why - I have merged data of this month from the export from WSWIN till 20100421081500 (rain0 0 0 211) and the RAW data from meteohub from 20100421081737 (rain0 0 0 8618).
I'll solve this tomorrow with replacing the data for the whole month with export data from WSWIN.

I'm very happy with the WSWIN import function, I was able to import all my data to meteohub :-)
(except the swapped local/sea level pressure)

Great news it's working with 4.6G :-)

I have one suggestion for the import function:
It would be nice, when there are no data (lost signal) from a sensor, that it doesn't import it.
Now it imports it as zeros, which makes a mess in graphs.

Example:
this
09.08.2008,00:20,26.0,23.9,,,,,23.8,51,53,,,,,1011.7,0.000,,,,5

is imported as
20080808222000 thb0 260 51 0151 9652 5 10117
20080808222000 th0 239 53 0137
20080808222000 th1 0 0 0000
20080808222000 th2 0 0 0000
20080808222000 th3 0 0 0000
20080808222000 th4 0 0 0000
20080808222000 t6 238
20080808222000 rain0 0 0 0
20080808222000 wind0 0 0 0 0239

but I think, it would be better as
20080808222000 thb0 260 51 0151 9652 5 10117
20080808222000 th0 239 53 0137
20080808222000 t6 238
20080808222000 rain0 0 0 0

The headline of WSWIN files determines what sensors to look for. I guess sensors listed are mentioned there.

I could change algorithm to skip sensors where no data being there although WSWIN says in the header that data these sensors are defined.

please give this file a try. It just works for SheevaPlug!

[file name=wswinload_sheeva.gz size=8026]http://www.meteohub.de/joomla/images/fb ... _sheeva.gz[/file]

I'm on it ...

It looks promising :-)

Thank you very much, now the imported data are perfect.

Will this version of wswinload be incorporated in the next version of Meteohub or should I save it?

this will be part of all coming updates in the sense of ongoing improvement. Thank you for testing this function so intensively, which makes it faster ready for production.

It took some time but the result is definitely worth it :-)