Mapping for WOW_UK (and other organisations)
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:34 pm
This weblink explains the actual formats expected by WOW_UK/MetOffice for various data-inputs through their API, with subsequent transfer of data to WOW_NL/KNMI, etc.
Because the nomenclature is not one-to-one, it triggers a question about Mapping in Meteobridge:
how can in Meteobridge's Mapping a T&H-set for 'grass'-data unambiguously be identified towards WOW_UK?
Not difficult if only 1 station feeding Meteobridge, but of interest if several stations feed and have candidates for the job.
Similar question how to clearly identify in Meteobridge's Mapping towards WOW_UK the Soil-info for -10cm, -30cm and -100cm.
Same question would apply to 'continental' organisations like KNMI and DWD, which prefer Soil-info for -10cm, -20cm, -50cm and -100cm.
In this perspective an interesting aspect:
you could feed WOW_UK with Soil-10, Soil-30 and Soil-100, but what would effectively be transferred by WOW_UK/MetOffice to WOW_NL/KNMI?
Adaptation Feb13, 2024:
Identification of organisations extended.
Because the nomenclature is not one-to-one, it triggers a question about Mapping in Meteobridge:
how can in Meteobridge's Mapping a T&H-set for 'grass'-data unambiguously be identified towards WOW_UK?
Not difficult if only 1 station feeding Meteobridge, but of interest if several stations feed and have candidates for the job.
Similar question how to clearly identify in Meteobridge's Mapping towards WOW_UK the Soil-info for -10cm, -30cm and -100cm.
Same question would apply to 'continental' organisations like KNMI and DWD, which prefer Soil-info for -10cm, -20cm, -50cm and -100cm.
In this perspective an interesting aspect:
you could feed WOW_UK with Soil-10, Soil-30 and Soil-100, but what would effectively be transferred by WOW_UK/MetOffice to WOW_NL/KNMI?
Adaptation Feb13, 2024:
Identification of organisations extended.