Page 1 of 1

Ice Days, Summer Days etc. definition error

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:08 pm
by che
Hi,

I've posted this a time ago already on the german "Wetterstationsforum":

I think there is an error in the Meteohub software application concerning the definitions of ice days, summer days and hot days. While frost days (days with temperature minimum below 0,0 °C) is correct, the given definitions of the other "special days" is wrong:

- for summer days, Meteohub defines "temperature maximum above 25 °C", but correct is "temperaturen maximum above equal 25,0 °C"
- for hot days, Meteohub defines "temperature maximum above 30 °C", but correct is "temperaturen maximum above equal 30,0 °C"
- For ice days (temperature maximum below 0,0 °C) there is no definition available. Only "temperature maximum below equal 0,0 °C" can be chosen, but an ice day doesn't include 0,0 °C according to international standard.

The errors might be small, but for comparison reasons, i think they should be fixed.

Christian

Re: Ice Days, Summer Days etc. definition error

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:47 pm
by wvdkuil
Would be nice to use those "special days" in Meteohub.
I have to compute them myself for my website.

Where can i find them in Meteohub?

Thanks,

Wim van der Kuil
http://www.weerstation-leuven.be

Re: Ice Days, Summer Days etc. definition error

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:03 pm
by che
Hi,

don't know exactly how it is in the english version; in the german version you can find it in the Meteohub application as follows:

Build Charts -> Graphical Display of the Data -> Notation -> Days with Special Weather as Histogram (last point in the Drop-Down)

Christian

Re: Ice Days, Summer Days etc. definition error

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:18 pm
by wfpost
I guess he didn´t mean a plot output, but variables

Re: Ice Days, Summer Days etc. definition error

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:42 pm
by WGDampoort
It would be nice if all plots also can be outputed as variables instead of an image.

Re: Ice Days, Summer Days etc. definition error

Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 12:27 pm
by che
wfpost wrote:I guess he didn´t mean a plot output, but variables
Sorry, no idea how to do this.