Help with incremental alarm

This section covers the Meteobridge PRO, PRO2, NANO SD, Raspberry Pi and VM platforms exclusively

Moderator: Mattk

Post Reply
weerwantijdijk
Senior Boarder
Senior Boarder
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 10:49 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Help with incremental alarm

Post by weerwantijdijk »

Can you please help me with this Twitter alarm; this way (see attached picture) it will only send out a alarm when temp reached 32°C But I want also send out a alarm when temp increases to 33, 34 etc that same day. What I’m doing wrong? Thanks for helping out
Attachments
FEC35947-9152-4BFD-B706-DEB071B46B2F.jpeg
FEC35947-9152-4BFD-B706-DEB071B46B2F.jpeg (68.92 KiB) Viewed 1682 times
Image
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re: Help with incremental alarm

Post by admin »

Hm, definition looks ok… can you please change to "[th0heatindex-act.0:0] - 31" and check the "i" icon on raised alerts.
weerwantijdijk
Senior Boarder
Senior Boarder
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 10:49 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help with incremental alarm

Post by weerwantijdijk »

Thanks for your reaction, appreciate that!
I have now changed it in " - 31" and the "i" icon shows other values now; First it said "raised condition #2: 20>=32->false (0.0000)"
After I changed it as you mentioned, it says: "raised condition #2: 20 - 31 -> false (-11.0000)"
Is that the right way for the system to interpret what I'm asking :)?
Isn't right to use the < or > or = when using " incremental alarm" ? Because if so, I have to change another alarm I've made for wind with windspeed < 75 km.
Hope hearing from you again.
Image
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re: Help with incremental alarm

Post by admin »

It should work both ways. Values greater zero are regarded true, else false. Advantage with the new formula is that one can more easily see in the log if the computation was done correctly.
Post Reply