SOLVED - New problem found after 3.1 version.

Discussion of the Meteohub software package

Moderator: Mattk

Post Reply
pirelli
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:14 pm
Location: Lysekil, Sweden

SOLVED - New problem found after 3.1 version.

Post by pirelli »

Hi,
I suddenly saw that when making a graph with wind data, I no longer have graph data of wind before yesterday.

Checking the wind0-day1 file display no data after 20080422110120. But my raw files have all the data there. I can't even see the data for the rest of April when trying to inspect any data after 20080422101502.

I've tried recompute but that didn't help either.

Any clues?

thanks,
L-I
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7953
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re:New problem found after 3.1 version.

Post by admin »

when recomputation doesn't fix this, there might malformed records in the raw data. Does "meteohub log" say anything interesting?
pirelli
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:14 pm
Location: Lysekil, Sweden

Re:New problem found after 3.1 version.

Post by pirelli »

I tried finding anything in the raw data but couldn't.

In the meteohub log there's new entries that I haven't seen before like:
logger (16.11.2008 19:06:08): started WMR-100 (2).
logger (16.11.2008 19:06:08): USB chip set: Vendor ID 0fde:ca01
startdate: 20081101000000
enddate: 20081116180635
cache flag: 1
reverse flag: 1
cache pos: 10599008
20081116180634 wind0 338 5.8 5.3 1.1
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7953
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re:New problem found after 3.1 version.

Post by admin »

I bet there is bad data in 200804. Try this:
1) halt data logging on "maintenance" page.
2) press "cleanup" on "inspect data" page.
3) restart data logging.
4) do recomputation.
pirelli
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:14 pm
Location: Lysekil, Sweden

Re:New problem found after 3.1 version.

Post by pirelli »

Should I do that in every month or just 200804?

Reply to myself: It was enough to do a cleanup of 200804. But why I haven't had that problem before 3.1, I don't know.

Why haven't I seen the Cleanup function before?

Thanks Boris,

regards
L-I
Post Reply