Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

All about the standard Meteobridge devices based on mobile routers from TP-Link, D-Link, ASUS

Moderator: Mattk

geoair
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:25 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by geoair »

The "User ID" is weather station name in Meteoclimatic?

geoair
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:25 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by geoair »

Hi,
I don't know if this has been already discussed between @Admin and @Ubik, but the date format output seems to be wrong.
Currently, meteobridge nano is 'exporting' the UPD value like 2019-01-0016 12:49, when meteoclimatic expects 16/01/2019 12:49.
Regards.

User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6075
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by admin »

My documentation tells me the UPD Meteobridge uses is fine.

Ubik
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:38 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by Ubik »

Hello, the date format that Meteoclimatic expects, is day / month / year "00/00/0000"
At this moment, what arrives is "year / month / day" but the day with four digits "0000/00/0000"
The filters do not allow that template, which is arriving, to be published.
I have also sent an email.
Greetings.

jmontamat
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:49 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by jmontamat »

*UPD=2019-01-0019 18:22 no valid format for meteoclimatic ???.

Meteobridge 3.9 (Jan 17 2019, build 12694), FW 1.4

Tnx.

Ubik
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:38 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by Ubik »

Hello
Unfortunately only the format that I said, "day / month / year" is supported.
Can you solve from your side ???

jmontamat
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:49 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by jmontamat »

for example:
*UPD=[DD]/[MM]/[YYYY] [hh]:[mm]

Ubik
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:38 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by Ubik »

Yes.

User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6075
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by admin »

Should be fixed with hot-fix released two days ago.

jmontamat
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:49 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by jmontamat »

after last reboot

Meteobridge 3.9 (Jan 25 2019, build 12697), FW 1.3
*UPD=25/01/2019 12:58

now if you thank you !!!!!

User avatar
agallardo1980
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:41 pm
Location: Almendralejo, Badajoz, ES
Contact:

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by agallardo1980 »

Hi,

I am a new Meteobridge PRO user from Spain. I want to upload to meteoclimatic too.
The date is correct now, but I have this with my solar and UV sensor in meteoclimatic template (I paste partial content to see this sensors only)

*SUN=1922.4
*DSUN=1929.6
*MSUN=2347.2
*YSUN=2347.2
*UVI=11.2
*DHUV=11.2
*MHUV=11.2
*YHUV=11.2
*EOT

SUN in W/m2 actual is about 538 W/m2 but in the template says 1922.4 ???
UV is actual 3.1 but in the template says 11.2 ??

I suppose that Daily, Month and Year UV and SUN is incorrect too. I await your answer. Thank you very much
Alexander Gallardo Herrero
MeteoAlmendralejo.es Owner & Administrator
C/ Zafra, s/n
06200 Almendralejo, Badajoz, ES
GPS: 38.67136,-6.38867 Elev: 376.2 m(Barometer),13.8 m(Anemometer)
E-mail: info@meteoalmendralejo.es
http://www.meteoalmendralejo.es

geoair
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:25 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by geoair »

admin wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:11 am
Should be fixed with hot-fix released two days ago.
Confirmed, data is uploaded and correctly recognized on meteoclimatic side.
However, I can also confirm what @agallardo1980: solar radiation and UV data is wrong
agallardo1980 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:48 pm
Hi,

I am a new Meteobridge PRO user from Spain. I want to upload to meteoclimatic too.
The date is correct now, but I have this with my solar and UV sensor in meteoclimatic template (I paste partial content to see this sensors only)

*SUN=1922.4
*DSUN=1929.6
*MSUN=2347.2
*YSUN=2347.2
*UVI=11.2
*DHUV=11.2
*MHUV=11.2
*YHUV=11.2
*EOT

SUN in W/m2 actual is about 538 W/m2 but in the template says 1922.4 ???
UV is actual 3.1 but in the template says 11.2 ??

I suppose that Daily, Month and Year UV and SUN is incorrect too. I await your answer. Thank you very much
Thank you very much

Ubik
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:38 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by Ubik »

Hi.
Effectively, now the sending of data is normal, the date format is correct.
Congratulate and thank you for the work you have done.
The problem that exists now, does not affect to upload data normally, since no filter is applied to the radiation data.
But hey, when Boris returns from vacation he sure solves it.
I will be aware of this matter.

I repeat, thank you.

Greetings.

User avatar
agallardo1980
Junior Boarder
Junior Boarder
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:41 pm
Location: Almendralejo, Badajoz, ES
Contact:

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by agallardo1980 »

Thanks. I hope that Boris can fix it soon. Thanks in advance.

Ubik: I have sent you a private message here for other topic related with meteoclimatic forum. Answer me when you can.

Thanks also.
Alexander Gallardo Herrero
MeteoAlmendralejo.es Owner & Administrator
C/ Zafra, s/n
06200 Almendralejo, Badajoz, ES
GPS: 38.67136,-6.38867 Elev: 376.2 m(Barometer),13.8 m(Anemometer)
E-mail: info@meteoalmendralejo.es
http://www.meteoalmendralejo.es

User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6075
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re: Meteoclimatic Support **solved**

Post by admin »

Thanks for the good catch on uvi and sloar radiation. There was a copy and paste error which I just fixed. Please try just released update.

Post Reply