Meteohub Update 4.2f

What's hot...

Moderator: Mattk

Rikken
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:47 am
Location: 41749 Viersen, Germany
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by Rikken »

Hi skyewright
Thanks for Information.... by the way: can I get back to 4.2e like upgrading to a higher version?

Greetings from sunny Germany!
Rikken
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:47 am
Location: 41749 Viersen, Germany
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by Rikken »

The wrong checksums are repeating exactly every 30 minutes...
skyewright
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by skyewright »

Rikken wrote:The wrong checksums are repeating exactly every 30 minutes...
Possibly a conflict with some other radio device and the two things happen to try to tramsmit at the same moment every 30 minutes (but the transmissions between those occasions are fine)?
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by admin »

As some of you reporting problems with recomputation my thought is that recomputation gets aborted by something and therefore data is not build up completely. As my rig does not show this effect it would be great help, if one of you who can reproduce the effect on his system would give me access to allow me some debugging.

@Rikken: Checksum error during logging data from wmrs-200 is not related to these troubles. I would consider that as usual behavior. It looks like one of the bytes for checksum has not been transferred for any reason. Dropping a packet once in half an hour would not worry me. If you are at NSLU2 and many other tasks are running in parallel (recomputation for example) this might happen.
Rikken
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:47 am
Location: 41749 Viersen, Germany
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by Rikken »

Yes, transmissions between are ok. But I think that the problem is not another radio device, cause never had wrong checksums with earlier versions. But who knows?
By the way: The station seems to work fine even with the wrong checksums, all data are displayed ok.
Rikken
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:47 am
Location: 41749 Viersen, Germany
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by Rikken »

Hi Boris

you might be right, cause my recomputation is still running. So i will wait, till its finished.
Thanks for information!

regards
User avatar
YJB
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:53 pm
Location: Venhuizen, Netherlands
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by YJB »

It will probably help Boris if the community can answer the following question:

Is this related to a specifc sensor type?
Or
Is this related to a specific weather station model.

Just list the weather station and the sensor model that shows the error. Maybe we are able to narrow the context of this issue in this way.
tervingo
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:36 pm
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by tervingo »

Hi,

In my case the problem does not seem to be related to any specific sensor. "hist-xxx" files under the weather directory are incomplete and finish in the middle of different sensor records, depending on the particular file.
I am using OS WMR-200
tervingo
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:36 pm
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by tervingo »

Boris,

Can you please confirm weather it is safe to downgrad from version 4.2f to version 4.2e while the problem is solved?

Thanks
skyewright
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by skyewright »

admin wrote:if one of you who can reproduce the effect on his system would give me access to allow me some debugging.
You have my details. You are welcome to visit. If you take a look at hist-day1 you'll find that the file is around 8KB and stops at:

day1_th5_dewmin_c 6

(well it did when I just looked, I think that when I looked earlier it had stopped at a different point?).

That's on meteohub-c running 4.2f.

meteohub-b running 4.2e and recording less sensors has a hist-day1 that is ~13KB and finishes at:

day1_thb9_sealevelmax_inhg 30.14
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by admin »

Downgrade to 4.2e is considered save. Just install 4.2e update.
skyewright
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by skyewright »

skyewright wrote:You have my details. You are welcome to visit. If you take a look at hist-day1 you'll find that the file is around 8KB and stops at:

day1_th5_dewmin_c 6
Quick update on this:
All the hist files that refresh each 5 minutes seem to be affected; all finishing 'short' but at various places.
At each refresh the hist-day1 file usually stops at around the point quoted above, but not always exactly there.
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by admin »

I found a bug that leads to segfaults (you can see these in "dmesg" logfile related to wmr928eval.

Brand new update 4.2g should fix this. You can update the leazy way with "Check Update" feature on "Maintenance" page.
skyewright
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by skyewright »

admin wrote:I found a bug that leads to segfaults (you can see these in "dmesg" logfile related to wmr928eval.

Brand new update 4.2g should fix this. You can update the leazy way with "Check Update" feature on "Maintenance" page.
Check Update worked great, but...

4.2g installed. Post-update recomputation completed. The hist files are all exactly as before I installed 4.2g - i.e. they have not been recalculated either during the recomputation nor since (and its been more than 5 minutes since completion).

dmesg reports segfaults...
cbhiii
Gold Boarder
Gold Boarder
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:02 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re:Meteohub Update 4.2f

Post by cbhiii »

Not to complicate things, but I'm running 4.2g and with my computation completed I'm NOT seeing problems anymore since the upgrade. All of my history appears to be displaying properly now.
Station: Davis Vantage Pro2 Plus
Hardware: Raspberry Pi 2 (Meteohub status)
Post Reply