Under the protocols i have at the meteohub-protocol very many wrong checksums? What is it?
logger (21.09.2009 18:56:01): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (0325 vs computed 02f2) for sensor model d7 in byte sequence: d7 10 37 12 15 09 09 00 bd 00 3e a0 00 00 25 03
logger (21.09.2009 19:19:01): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (024d vs computed 0405) for sensor model d7 in byte sequence: d7 10 d1 d6 0d 13 13 15 09 09 c4 23 02 34 4d 02
logger (21.09.2009 19:59:40): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (d7d1 vs computed 0337) for sensor model d7 in byte sequence: d7 10 3a 13 15 09 09 00 f0 00 42 aa 00 00 d1 d7
logger (21.09.2009 20:08:24): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (0000 vs computed 0222) for sensor model d6 in byte sequence: d6 0d d3 10 08 14 15 09 09 0d 0c 00 00
logger (21.09.2009 21:11:51): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (0909 vs computed 0305) for sensor model d6 in byte sequence: d6 0d 0b 15 15 d1 d7 10 0b 15 15 09 09
logger (21.09.2009 23:29:31): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (4200 vs computed 035f) for sensor model d3 in byte sequence: d3 10 1d 17 15 d7 10 1d 17 15 09 09 00 f1 00 42
logger (21.09.2009 23:43:40): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (10d7 vs computed 01b2) for sensor model d9 in byte sequence: d9 08 00 00 00 d1 d7 10
logger (21.09.2009 23:48:32): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (3010 vs computed 0609) for sensor model d4 in byte sequence: d4 16 d1 d7 10 30 17 15 09 09 00 f0 00 43 b4 00 00 3c 03 d3 10 30
logger (22.09.2009 00:02:55): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (10d3 vs computed 02fa) for sensor model d7 in byte sequence: d7 10 02 00 16 09 09 00 f0 00 43 b4 00 02 d3 10
logger (24.09.2009 15:30:57): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (0109 vs computed 0270) for sensor model d7 in byte sequence: d7 10 1e 0f 18 09 09 00 d3 10 1f 0f 18 09 09 01
Protocol: Wrong checksum
Moderator: Mattk
-
- Senior Boarder
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: 28865 Lilienthal, Germany
Re:Protocol: Wrong checksum
Hello,
The same here, especially after update from ver 4 to ver4a.
As stated already in the NSLU forum part, am unable to stop data logging ...
In addition an error message on the System Information Page: Error file open /home/meteohub/meteohub.conf
The same here, especially after update from ver 4 to ver4a.
As stated already in the NSLU forum part, am unable to stop data logging ...
In addition an error message on the System Information Page: Error file open /home/meteohub/meteohub.conf
-
- Junior Boarder
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:47 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re:Protocol: Wrong checksum
Hello, i'll the same Message in the "meteohub.log".
Software-Version: 4.5g
The Software don't recognize the Rain-Sensor.
Hardware:
WMR200
Alix1.D
Software-Version: 4.5g
Code: Select all
logger (29.10.2009 18:26:48): station 0 (WMR-200), wrong checksum (0100 vs computed 0000) for sensor model d9 in byte sequence: d6 d1 d3 10 17 12 1d 0a 09 0b 0c 00 00 00 00 20 73 01 d7 10 17 12 1d 0a 09 00 d1 00 34 6e 00 00 b3 02 d2 31 2e 0f 1a 0a 09 00 00 00 00 04 00 38 00 14 16 10 0a 09 0d 0c 00 00 00 00 20 ff f3 03 25 34 01 00 ce 00 32 64 00 00 21 d6 00 39 82 00 00 94 07 d2 31 2f 0f 1a 0a 09 00 00 00 00 04 00 38 00 14 16 10 0a 09 0d 0c 00 00 00 00 20 ff f3 03 25 34 01 00 ce 00 32 64 00 00 21 d6 00 39 82 00 00 95 07 d2 31 30 0f 1a 0a 09 00 00 00 00 04 00 38 00 14 16 10 0a 09 0d 0c 00 00 00 00 20 ff f3 03 25 34 01 d2 31 32 0f 1a 0a 09 00 00 00 00 04 00 38 00 14 16 10 0a 09 0d 0c 00 00 00 00 20 ff f3 03 25 34 01 00 ce 00 32 64 00 00 21 d6 00 39
Hardware:
WMR200
Alix1.D
Re:Protocol: Wrong checksum
The wrong checksum does not harm the logging of the data (for my station).
Boris mentioned some time before that this is not critical.
Boris mentioned some time before that this is not critical.
-
- Platinum Boarder
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:27 pm
- Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland
Re:Protocol: Wrong checksum
It most likely means that there was a bad packet of data for some reason or other. There are very many reasons why data might occasionally get "damaged" in transit - that's what checksums are there to protect against. :)Vetinari wrote:Boris mentioned some time before that this is not critical.