Update 4.6k

[doublecheese]

I am trying the Map, but the Yearly data it is producing for my station is not correct? (I am the only one in Scotland, UK).

I am guessing that is because meteohub server that collects your data does not have enough data to calculate your yearly data.

I think it only started collecting data since a few days

[Nitro70]

Thanks to Boris,

have update to 4.6k done. It runs very well now! The rain data and the wedaal-history works very well too.

Great job, Boris ...

[skyewright]

I am trying the Map, but the Yearly data it is producing for my station is not correct?

Does Meteohplug have data for all this all this year? To achieve that you'd either need to have been uploading all year, or to have imported data for the missing months.

(I am the only one in Scotland, UK).

There's me, and at least one other I know of. I'll not be activating the map function myself quite yet because th0, thb0 wind0 and rain0 aren't my "prime" sensors nowadays, so any data shown would not be representative. However once there is a way to show the sensors I want, then I expect to join.

[admin]

Next update will take the definitions which sensors to take as primary sensors from your "weather networks" page to identify which sensors to take for showing values on the map.

You can use "th*" in your meteoplug chart definitions to address, that the primary "th" sensor should be taken. I hope to release that during the week end.

[Nitro70]

Hat sich erledigt ...

[gm4jjj]

I am trying the Map, but the Yearly data it is producing for my station is not correct?

Does Meteohplug have data for all this all this year? To achieve that you'd either need to have been uploading all year, or to have imported data for the missing months.

(I am the only one in Scotland, UK).

There's me, and at least one other I know of. I'll not be activating the map function myself quite yet because th0, thb0 wind0 and rain0 aren't my "prime" sensors nowadays, so any data shown would not be representative. However once there is a way to show the sensors I want, then I expect to join.

Thanks.

I presumed that meteoplug just asked for the data it needed without user intervention? (Taking the max min records like WDL does). I am not a registered Meteoplug user, only providing data to the Map as an experiment. I don't plan to subscribe to Meteoplug.

Have not seen any other Scottish users on the Map yet.

[skyewright]

I presumed that meteoplug just asked for the data it needed without user intervention? (Taking the max min records like WDL does).

Meteoplug is a "logger", just as Meteohub is, so it only knows about the data readings that have been uploaded to it.

When you upload data to Meteoplug you are essentially just uploading the raw data readings since the last upload plus some configuration details, so it will only have "seen" the rain that has fallen since you activated "Data Upload".

WDL works in a totally different way; the files that it uses are sumaries prepared by Meteohub.

You might say that Meteohub provides data to Meteoplug, but information to WDL. Does that make sense now?

If you use Meteoplug itself you can import your older Meteohub "raw" files to fill the gap (that's what I did).

[gm4jjj]

Thanks for excellent explanation.

[d_l]

Am I the only one still seeing the "^ " output for a single blank space (" ") in the station title on the WDL display? This apparently carried over from the problem in 4.6j?

For me, 4.6k fixed the problem the Meteohub WDL entry screen had with blanks, but there is still one "^" being inserted before the " " in the WDL output.

[admin]

under some circumstances this problem is still there. Will be fixed with next update.

[skyewright]

Have not seen any other Scottish users on the Map yet.

I'm there now.