Automatic generation of graphs/stats for historical data

Requests for future functionality

Moderator: Mattk

Post Reply
rune
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:51 pm

Automatic generation of graphs/stats for historical data

Post by rune »

As posted earlier...


Being a beginner with this wonderful product Meteohub and having scanned "hundreds" of Meteohub driven webpages, I've noticed the lack (or didn't I find it? ) of automatically generated historical data (Beyond the current month & year)

What I'm looking for, is a mechanism to generate graphs & statistics for the past. E.g. at this moment in time (November), I would like to auto-generate graph+statictics for all the months (jan, feb, mar, etc.) up to now (this year)+year-to-date. First thing next year, I would like a complete 2009 graph+statictics and so on...

So some kind of "one-time" graph+stat generation that sums up the past. I don't need it to re-calc as the past seems to be pretty static

The alternative is to manually create+generate this graphs. But when it's been generated I can delete them again! An automatic setting would make this very smooth.

Am I making sense or
Does anyone else see a need for this?
User avatar
WS Grave
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:42 pm
Location: Grave - the Netherlands
Contact:

Re:Automatic generation of graphs/stats for historical data

Post by WS Grave »

The past weather sometimes seems really past.
The only way to make it visible is with help of the graphs, but they don't "read" as easy as text ;)
So I second this wish.
User avatar
AenG
Senior Boarder
Senior Boarder
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 am
Location: Boskamp, Netherlands
Contact:

Re:Automatic generation of graphs/stats for historical data

Post by AenG »

That's also my wish.
bensca
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Augsburg-Germany
Contact:

Re:Automatic generation of graphs/stats for historical data

Post by bensca »

My wish, too :)
Post Reply