Asus WL-330N3G vs. WL-330N

All about the standard Meteobridge devices based on mobile routers from TP-Link, D-Link, ASUS

Moderator: Mattk

Post Reply
TheWalrus
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:43 pm

Asus WL-330N3G vs. WL-330N

Post by TheWalrus »

I saw that I could use an Asus WL-330N3G for a Meteobridge, but when I was looking at picking one up I noticed that there was also a WL-330N model that did not have the 3G for about $20 cheaper. Would the same firmware work on both models or is there something about the 3G version that is necessary?
TheWalrus
Fresh Boarder
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:43 pm

Re: Asus WL-330N3G vs. WL-330N

Post by TheWalrus »

I think I figured an answer to my own question. I had assumed that the micro USB port on the device could be used for weather station communication, but I'm sure that this is not correct. The 3G model would be necessary for USB communication.
User avatar
admin
Platinum Boarder
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:51 pm

Re: Asus WL-330N3G vs. WL-330N

Post by admin »

The WL-330N is not supported by OpenWRT, which is the OS underneath Meteobridge application code. Therefore, no go with the WL-330N, sorry.

The WL-330N3G has OpenWRT support and also has a full working 1.x USB driver implementation that makes using a mandatory USB hub (as with the Atheros chip based TP-Link and D-Link router) obsolete. If you want to spare the external USB hub the WL-330N3G is a fine choice for Meteobridge.
Post Reply