weatherist34 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 2:50 pm
i can adapt the template accordingly however until my unit arrives im not going to do anything until then so i can actually determine what is correct. as it is now
180 [air0pm-act:--] * Davis Air Quality PM1 New september 2020
181 [air1pm-act:--] * Davis Air Quality PM 2.5 New september 2020
182 [air2pm-act:--] * Davis Air Quality PM 10 New september 2020
Thanks for the confirmation. I will change on the upload template by swapping air0pm and air2pm. No need to touch the code on your side for that.
it was the original string position for ecowitt stuff it will be replaced once I have my brain around all airlink thing i.e will be used amongst others like
[air1pm-dmax:--] day max, [air1pm-avg10:--] 10 min avg , day min and so on
(*2nd Update for 5th October 07:57)
* Adds sun position design to all sun related modules
* Aligns Davis air quality values due to firmware API change Ref Boris
* Finalized CSS files for recent new features at sub 100kb
* Catalan language updated Ref Jopsep
* Adds user selected timeformat to Sun related modules
* Adds gradient to rain rate indicator blue to red pending on rain rate intensity
* Attempts to fix unknown strings appearing in API after firmware updates
it used to be fun .... for those that have emailed thinking template update broke things this morning this is nothing do with template ...you can simply check that meteobridge is not sending any data the output is looking like this for many this morning . I have simply have no idea for the last time this template does not control meteobridge itself it simply only displays what is sent to it . so for many your output looks like this I have no explanation only thing im seeing similar is they are Meteobridge Pro based this should taken up in a new thread perhaps here as it look related viewtopic.php?f=61&t=15186
you should edit your post adding the word firmware update ...please everyone i always help anyone via email but this simply is not an issue i can help with please either participate in this thread viewtopic.php?f=61&t=15186 or contact boris not me , there is nothing i can do ..ps im not the meteobridge guy or developer im just a weather34 template designer ..
Brian,
i know this but I had also written that Boris would fix it, not you.
Have edited my post in the other thread and deleted it here to avoid ambiguity.
regards
Mike
thank you just gets overwhelming watching the inbox ping with stuff I cant help with...
for Davis Air Quality users the module was reworked and simplified in update just now to use only PM 2.5 .. future update will have a dedicated pop up screen like purple air to have the extra data for pm10,temp etc.. expecting mine to arrive this week as customs just cleared it this morning so I can build around something right in front of me without having to guess or assume , expect additional charts, almanac data and other things related to this to appear in due course..
weatherist34 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2020 11:51 am
... Davis Air Quality ... expecting mine to arrive this week as customs just cleared it this morning
Good news for you. It will be really interesting to see how accurate you think the device is compared to your Nova SDS011. I think my Airlink is not the stunning success I think it should be. I've both sensors in the same room, less than 10cm from each other. The Airlink insists on reading mostly lower and also reading zero particulates (on all three sensors) for periods when I know the air is not "clean".
See the chart below which shows correlation...to an extent.
weatherist34 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2020 8:10 am
it used to be fun .... for those that have emailed thinking template update broke things this morning this is nothing do with template ...you can simply check that meteobridge is not sending any data the output is looking like this for many this morning . I have simply have no idea for the last time this template does not control meteobridge itself it simply only displays what is sent to it . so for many your output looks like this I have no explanation only thing im seeing similar is they are Meteobridge Pro based this should taken up in a new thread perhaps here as it look related viewtopic.php?f=61&t=15186
Sorry to all (and especiylly to Brian who got tons of mails). It was my fault resp. a bug in the Meteobridge SW introduced as a side effect of a too speedy fix yesterday evening. Things should now work again.
No problem Boris shit happens and even more disappointing me and my wife would have been at our first Oktober Fest last week
Update 08-10-2020 file
adds additional option for those using meteobridge air quality assigned sensor from different brands.
aqi.jpg (71.81 KiB) Viewed 4056 times
*caution removal of accreditations and license link you will blacklisted in next version release and see a continuous nag screen everywhere not just in one place .its not a lot to ask but obviously some feel its there work want the status ..be ethical be respectful it creates a happy medium...excuses of sorry it was accidental is bullshite...do I look dumb ?
Sorry you missed out on Octoberfest. Just updated to the latest and it looks like there may be a small alignment issue, with the graphic, in the wind modules. I checked it on most all of the browsers and it seems to be pervasive - IOS and Windows.
.... for those that have emailed thinking template update broke things this morning this is nothing do with template ...you can simply check that meteobridge is not sending any data the output is looking like this for many this morning . I have simply have no idea for the last time this template does not control meteobridge itself it simply only displays what is sent to it . so for many your output looks like this I have no explanation only thing im seeing similar is they are Meteobridge Pro based this should taken up in a new thread perhaps here as it look related
